A-04 · The test bench · Lens under test: element 28 · SMC

The Long That Came Before the Sweep

A correct read, a losing trade, and the one variable that would have changed it.

§1 · Replay the test

Five frames. Step through them.

Frame 5 Price trades the Asian high: the exact target the plan named. The read held. The trade did not.

The plan, line by line, against what actually happened.

Item	Procedure	Observed	Status
Entry	On the sweep, once displacement breaks back into the range.	Inside the range, while price drifted toward the lows. Nothing swept yet.	Deviation
Stop	Beyond the sweep low.	Inside the liquidity the plan expected to be taken.	Deviation
Target	The Asian high.	Traded — two candles after the stop.	Met
Risk	1% of the account — one R.	1% — one R. Lost in full.	Met

Why 1Why did it lose? The stop was taken before the sweep printed.
Why 2Why was the stop there? It sat inside the liquidity the plan itself expected to be taken.
Why 3Why inside it? The entry came first, so the stop had to sit just under the range.
Why 4Why so early? The trigger in use was “price near the lows”, not “sweep printed”.
Why 5Why that trigger? The plan described the entry in words, not as a condition you could check.
RootThe entry trigger was never written as a checkable condition.

Diagnosis

Execution, not hypothesis.

The liquidity was where the plan said. Displacement came. The target traded. The read held — the trade didn't.

One variable · everything else held constant

Variable

The entry trigger

From

Price is near the lows.

The sweep has printed AND displacement has closed back inside the range.

Re-test log · next 10 setups

Tap a box to mark it pass, fail, or open again.

Pass 3 · Fail 1 · Open 6

Rule 027 · Confirmation

A breakout is confirmed by follow-through, not by the break candle.

Rule 041 · Liquidity

A sweep is only confirmed after the fact.

Run your own test

Navrya's trade review asks the same question of every trade you log: hypothesis, or execution?